Wednesday 22 December 2010

Evaluation - Question 4

Question 4:

How did you use new media technologies in the construction and research, planning and evaluation stages?

Research:

During the individual research that was carried out before our planning essential website and forms of technology were used to compare, contrast and evaluate other music videos, cd digipacks and websites to make sure the right ideas and inspirations and were collected and researched so that our final product would hopefully sell in the industry. I used YouTube for my analysis of two music videos (Diana Vickers - "The Boy Who Murdered Love" and Natalie Imbruglia "Shiver") and this enabled me to embed the videos on to my blog. This would help me and people reading my blog, because they can then have the video to play and "engage" with which would then increase the understanding of my analysis. Also giving an audience a visual representation to go along side the text will hopefully increase their interest and make them want to be engaged and involved (play button - interactive) with the product and the hypothetical "analysis".

Also for the analysis of the digipack, I used google to get images of CD artwork for "Ellie Goulding" and "Madonna". "Google" has helped me analyse these CD digipacks by providing me with images, which inspired me during my planning process. When using "Google" i filtered my searches quite specifically so that I found what I was looking for. This was quite an easy process and very efficient, however because there are thousands of results, and all different quality, I had to be certain that the specific image was suitable for my analysis.

For the website research I researched "Florence + the Machine"'s site, this was again using "Google" as the search engine. Due to what I searched this site was very easy to find and open, therefore again enabled me to analyse it well. To get the aspects of the site on my blog I had to print screen the website and then crop in Microsoft PowerPoint. I would have made sense to do it in Microsoft Word, however from this programme you could not then right click and save as image. This tool was similar in my music analysis. To enhance audience understanding I print screened the shots I was analysing, this was a time consuming activity, however it was easier for me to discuss knowing images were available to refer to (and remember). Whilst doing this "blogger" allowed me to import pictures, however the format and positions of these pictures were not easy to control. This was a major disadvantage to this blogger site because it increased the time it would take to make a post if you were including pictures. This was very hard and "fiddly", causing the layout of some posts to be "unattractive". This was very frustrating and took up a lot of unproductive time trying to correct.

Planning:

During the planning stage I firstly used a scanner to upload our mind maps and storyboards and uploaded them using blogger. I had the same problem with the importing of photos. However it is easier to prove that these were done and is an easier way to show the work, rather than there being loads of text on a post. I did then analysis and discuss in more depth our ideas in the mind maps, but at least it meant that the audience have other mediums to focus on rather than just "bulks" of text. This also makes the post more attractive and appealing to read. It is easier to type up work on to an electronic blog because you know that it it safe, and at one point we had lost the storyboards/mind maps because they were on paper, luckily we found them, but this problem wasn't evident during our blog posts because it saved automatically and can be transferred on emails if a member of the group was absent. This helps group efficiency and especially in our group, because being absent was quite regular from some people, it helped them to keep connected with the group and "up to speed" with improvements, adjustments and new ideas. Because we had a group of 4, this tool was vital.

Blogger Overall Evaluation

This site, despite it being very difficult and time consuming to upload photos is also very frustrating, in terms of the "hyperlink" section. In terms of "spaces" the compose box doesn't always look exactly how it will appear on your blog, similarly with the "preview" - which you would've thought would be exact version. Now, although it has more "interactive" sections and it is a save way of publishing text, you can also include pictures (more easily) on Microsoft word and print it off with your choice of layout (as long as you back up). Also, in terms of "mistakes" done on "blogger" - there is no "undo" button, for example if you delete something by pressing the "backspace" button to decrease the "line space" and hold it too much it deletes text. This happened last year and I had to re-do whole post. Now "blogger" did allow us to upload YouTube videos/ videos - which was a big help during our research section and also reinforcing our new direction half way through our piece. These filming videos helped show that we had evaluated our progress so far and to be efficient we deleted certain shots from our final library of videos so that when we were editing we didn't have to go through folder of clips.

Video

For this section of production we used a digital video recorder, which at times had its problems. Certain video recorders automatically change the format of the uploaded videos depending on the model. We had a problem with this when we used a different camera, the files which were uploaded from this had a different format when imported to Adobe Premier Pro. I think that Adobe Premier Pro is a very useful and professional piece of software when creating videos, however it put me off initially because it seemed very "difficult to use". I think it could be placed and organised differently on the page. This made me not want to be in charge of editing, due to the fact that it looked "difficult", however towards the middle of the editing process, due to lack of time i decided to try it out, and surprisingly understood what I had to do. The rendering process is very time consuming and uploading to YouTube and took up a lot of our time although we did try our hardest to make good use of this time.

Digipack

For this I used Microsoft PowerPoint to design the several designs of the CD digipack. Because I had used PowerPoint before I felt confident with the layout of the programme and the things that could be done including effects, colours and shapes. This gave us a huge advantage on time management whilst designing this because we didn't have to figure out how to use a programme before we got designing. I think PowerPoint, although can produce unprofessional work, can also transform an image to make it more appealing and "striking". For example the black and white effect on the image made the fairly "normal" picture of Sophie become something that would attract attention in a store.

Website

For this section of production we wasted quite a lot of time because of the "initial thought" of difficulty, this similarly to "Adobe Premier Pro", scared us all because we had to use a programme which we weren't all familiar with. This caused this section of the production to be placed last on our timetable. However this was a bad mistake because this piece of software required us to get help and advice from our teachers and IT specialists so that we could set up the basic website. During the time were cd drafting was in progress I also designed certain website drafts and mock ups on Microsoft PowerPoint so I then made all the shapes, texts and effects in to one picture by grouping them. This was a hassle when inserted into Dreamweaver because it was just an image which no text could be layered over. However we sorted it by importing the picture in to Fireworks and creating different hyperlink sections, then it was easier to scroll over in Dreamweaver. This was initially very confusing, however towards the end I realised that our idea worked and was achievable with the software given.

Tuesday 21 December 2010

Tuesday 21st December - Evaluation Question 3

Evaluation - Question 3:

What have you learnt from your audience feedback?

Our feedback was mostly positive, we have had two ranges of feedback, one via the YouTube channel and a range of teenage feedback during our showcase. I think this feedback linked to our target audience and therefore was treated like the correct feedback which would then hopefully result in more effective and interesting video.

Positives:

“Lip-syncing was well executed” - This piece of feedback was positive and this was a conscious effort throughout our filming sessions to make sure this was achieved. I agree with this feedback point because we worked very hard with Sophie to ensure that she sang the song, and then was muted in post-production.

“The confidence in Sophie, as an actor, was shown, therefore making the performance effective” and “Performance was very believable” – This positive piece of feedback was again due to our casting. We cast Sophie due to her past experience with GCSE/AS Drama and Theatre Studies and role in the school production “We Will Rock You”. Sophie is a very confident performer, which worked very well during the production of our music video because of her ability to become a character and resulting in the audience obviously believing the character and being engaged within the video and narrative.

“Variety of shots/angles worked well” – This editing piece of feedback was again an effort throughout the editing process, and filming to make sure there were different angles, portraying Sophie in a different way to increase certain audience impression/emotion. Every time we filmed a shot we would always do it at least twice to ensure that different angles were used and also there would be enough material if any “blanks” occurred during the editing process. I think our music video has a various shots which increases the flow between shots and hopefully increase audience interest.

“The lighting in the music video was appropriate and showed the shot clearly” – This piece of feedback was a reliving point to get back because we had problems with our lighting, due to Josh’s accidently not checking white balance on 50% of the original footage. However we re-filmed this and these problems were soon sorted out. I agree with this feedback because of our effort during this issue and I hope that in our final product the lighting is perfect.

“The narrative was easy to follow” – This was an aim during our planning process was to make the narrative interesting, but easy to follow throughout the production. This clearly was achieved and although I was involved with the narrative planning I think it is fairly obvious when certain climaxes of the storyline occur and the symbolism stays evident throughout.

“Very sharp and great edits "to the beat" during fast sections + good variety of edits” – This was a decision during the editing process to standardise the editing when certain people did certain bits. In the end it was mostly one person, but at least this rule was put in to place to ensure continuity in the video. We used “fade to blacks” in certain sections of the video to represent the characters memory in the format of flashbacks. We did this hopefully to give the audience more information about the characters life therefore their understanding of the video was enhanced. I agree with this piece of feedback and due to our effort during those sections am happy that it was achieved correctly.

“Camera movement and placement was effective” – This piece of feedback proved our effort during the filming period. We would always check the camera screen to make sure Sophie was either centre of the screen or that none of Sophie, unless deliberate, was cut off the view, therefore I agree.

“Black and white worked "well" and suited the track and narrative” – This colour decision was made in the initial planning period of our music video, which we thought would be “unique” and “different”. Also this colour decision represents the characters “dull” and “neutral” life. I agree with this point because we tried it in colour and it didn’t have the same professional feel.

“Good use of symbolism "mannequin" – This piece of feedback made our decision of choosing the symbolic approach correct. I agree with this, because due to the relationship between the character and the acting of Sophie the connection was believable. Also due to the fact the mannequin was “breakable” Sophie could harm it, without the actor, if played by Tom, feeling any damage.

Constructive:

“Pre-song material - track wasn't appropriate” – This was a problem was an issue which we discussed beforehand , however we then decided that is created atmosphere and perhaps slight tension. But when we showcased it, our target audience thought that it sounded like “hoover” but couldn’t be silent, therefore needed to be sorted out. I disagree with this point, because if you listen really carefully you can hear a “faint” argument which reinforces the cohesion with the moving image. I think that we could have made slower, acoustic, instrumental version at the start to set the genre of the song, however this was impossible due to the track or piano music available.

"Sophie smiles at the end of the "window scene" - This piece of feedback we all realised as we watched it on YouTube before we showed other people. This was due to the fact we hadn’t thoroughly checked the final product in Adobe Premier Pro before exporting it. We cropped this shot in the commencing weeks so that the shot after was slightly longer. This was quite an easy mistake to rectify and I agree completely with what was said about it. For our final edit we learnt to check the version before exporting, which in the long run saved time in the exportation and uploading on YouTube.

"Fuzzy" bit at the start where the screen goes shaky - this problem happened during the capturing process” – This fault was due to the camera and not the editing. Whilst uploading our clips a “fuzzy line” was already on the clip before we inserted it in to Adobe Premier. We didn’t want to erase this shot from the music video because the zoom from the window, either side of the “fuzzy line”, was a perfect zoom. We tried editing effects over the top of the section in post-production however these effects just enhanced and highlighted it even more. Therefore we have tried all we can to try and hide it, but we have decided to keep it in for the final edit because unless you look for it, it isn’t too obvious. To overcome this problem we should have re-filmed this shot, if we would have had more time.

“Photo album - could be more specific and show who is in them. Ambiguity works well though” – this piece of feedback I didn’t agree with. The photo album was to give the impression that she was reminiscing on past memories, however people said that would it be clearer if there were a few shots of the pages in the album showing the people in the photos. I think that ambiguity is an important factor here because due to the blunt video, the audience know how the separate characters are feeling. But we wanted the photos to be like the argument, ambiguous. This is due to the fact that audience members could feel more engaged if they are involved in the plot line and the character’s past by thinking for themselves and wondering at certain points in the video about the narrative.

Overall these feedback points were mostly positive which we were really proud of. The majority of the constructive points were easily achieved and corrected which was helpful, however the “fuzzy line” wasn’t sorted out. This mistake isn’t enhanced by anything and a pure mistake of the camera upload.

Tuesday 21st December - Evaluation Question 2

Evaluation Question 2:

How effective is the combination of your main product and ancillary texts?

As a group we have tried to ensure that the artist has a specific theme throughout all the products designed. Initially, whilst planning we decided that we would film our music video in black and white, this was to highlight her “dull” life, before she had expressed herself. Therefore in the production of the website and CD cover, because I was in charge of the initial designed, I ensured that these designs had kept with the theme of the original intention of the music video. During the second draft process of the CD cover Tom had this idea of splitting the CD design in two, one side showing the character’s (in the debut single) vulnerable personality (below left) and one showing the character’s “confident”, “violent” persona (below right). These images were executed in the booklet in the CD case to reinforce the “split personality” theme shown in the music video. To reinforce this main theme we had acoustic and big instrument tracks to represent the two sides of the artist and if we were writing the songs for the able, we would ensure that the lyrics of the songs link to the theme of the overall artist. However when I designed the first few drafts of the website I kept very much to the “vulnerable” personality, with just little sections representing the characters “broken” personality. Whilst in this stage Tom found a certain font online which reinforced this “broken” idea, which I then pasted in to the design. This text design had broken looked very distorted and had a “brick” texture, this represented the “toughness” and “confident” side of the character, however it also illustrates that she has been metaphorically “broken” , representing her heartbroken emotions. This, therefore added a section of the “rocky” personality to the website and was then reinforced at a later stage by me inserting some photos of Sophie in the “corset” costume.

As Richard Dyer has noted: “a star is an image constructed from a range of materials”

For pop music these materials include:

• the songs (their lyrical themes and musical structures/genres)
• the record covers (singles and albums and the image of the star they present)


We have tried to follow Dyer’s conventions in our ancillary products. This has hopefully been achieved by the “lyrical themes” and “genres” of the music video which are also evident as themes on both the website and CD cover.



Advertising – CD Cover + Website


In terms of advertising, firstly the CD cover has a main image of the artist lying on a guitar. This immediately gives the impression that they potentially could play an instrument and has a passion for music. This will hopefully increase the positivity of this artist in the audience’s mind, therefore encouraging them to buy the artist’s album due to its genuine, authentic feel. Usually members of the public are affected in the decision about an artist due to their publicity and actual personality, which comes across in interviews. Due to the fact we are unable to do this; we have ensured that the personality of the artist has come across, not only in the front CD image with the guitar but also in the CD booklet with personal messages to her fans. This will hopefully increase audience engagement with her CD cover, adding a personal feel, therefore could result in purchase.


The website has a similar effect, by having photos of Sophie, almost giving the “Picture frame” effect, and arranged in a way like sideboard full of photo frames would. This “photo frame” idea, came initially from the shots in the music video where the vulnerable character reminisced the positive times of her life with her boyfriend. Therefore this effect has reinforced this theme, but changed the perception of viewing. Now, on the website, the audience are looking at the character, therefore hopefully feeling involved within the product and therefore encouraged to explore the site and find out more information about her.

Monday 20 December 2010

Monday 20th December - Evaluation Question 1

Evaluation - Question 1


In what ways does your media product use, develop or challenge forms and conventions of real media products?

Camerawork:

Our media product has utilised, adapted and challenged ideas, concepts and shots from existing music videos and our own ideas, therefore incorporating the correct overall feel and image for a pop music video. We have filmed a range of shots, whilst filming, so that at the post production stage we would have enough material, in case there were “blanks” in the video. We executed various shot types and angles (like close up, long shot, mid shot, tracking shot, zoom shot) to portray the artist in different ways depending on the section of the narrative. We also used fast cuts to make sure the shots were transitioned, in sync with the different pace sections of the song. This hopefully makes the music video shots and narrative fit perfectly to the song in terms of lyrics, pace and shot composition, therefore hopefully increasing the audience interaction and engagement with the music video, thus increasing audience enjoyment. Rapid shot changes and unusual angels will appeal to a younger audience and keep them engaged.

Cheryl Cole - The Flood Music Video



(Above is Cheryl Cole's (Pop Artist) music video to her second single "The Flood". This music video has fast pace cuts and beats to the music like in our video. Also voyeurism is evident in this video through the use of camera and close ups of the pop star.)

We have tried to maintain consistent themes and “personality” throughout all our media products. This has hopefully been achieved by the similar graphology of the CD cover, pack and website. The track titles also link to the narrative of the video, which creates the relationship between the first single music video and the overall theme of her album, therefore reinforcing this maintained “star image”. Richard Dyer noted: a star is an image constructed from a range of materials”, we had followed this carefully to ensure that these elements completed whilst producing our products. The “songs” and “record covers” ideas of his theory have been followed in our production, however due to our media a2 production specification it wasn’t possible to do “live productions” and “media coverage”. Due to our artists certain image it would be planned to be followed and maintained throughout her album promotion and tours. We devised a definite image for our artist/star and this is carefully promoted throughout our work because of the reinforced cohesion.


(above are examples of Ellie Goulding’s pop artist image and how it’s maintained throughout her media products, reinforcing Dyer’s theory. (l-r) Tour photograph, Still shot of “Guns and Horses” music video and album artwork for her single “The Writer)

We tried to increase the voyeurism is our music video by the choice of costume, shot angle and Sophie’s acting. I think this was quite successful because the voyeurism was still evident in the vulnerable character sections, just because of what she was wearing and the setting of the bedroom and garden bench. The transition shots where the character changes metaphorically and physically from her innocent personality include close ups and mirror shots which include Sophie’s back and close ups of her face, applying makeup. This can relate due to the typical female teenager, but also will hopefully stereotypically appeal to a male audience due to the voyeuristic shot types, this is again reinforced later in the video with the mannequin scenes, where the character has a bare upper chest and shoulders and the wall shots where the corset is enhancing her chest. Also the naked mannequin reinforced some voyeurism in these shots due to its female sex appeal.

These images also appeal to a female audience due to the personal memories and perhaps past experience which this character could represent them, therefore they know and can feels similar emotions, therefore staying engaged with the video and performance.


(above are images and screen shots of our music video and are examples of the conventions adopted in our video)

Black and White - Inspiration and Justification

This decision, made quite early in our planning preparation, was (personally and individually) inspired by two videos. Both of these videos reinforce how important and effective black and white videos can be, especially when linked with a powerful narrative, which both of these videos include. Also in Beyonce's "If I Were a Boy" director Jake Nava has also filmed a section of "pre-song material". We also decided to have this in our music video, not only to reinforce the storyline but also it gives the audience an opportunity to get to know the character(s) involved in the narrative, therefore hopefully increasing their audience engagement, understanding and involvement.


Beyonce - "If I Were a Boy"



Pixe Lott - "Cry Me Out"




These two videos show very powerful and emotive storylines within the tracks, which was our main aim from the start of our planning. Therefore these two videos are similar to ours, in terms of the colour choice and narrative performance/direction.

Friday 17 December 2010

Final Edit - "Not Made For This"

This final edit hasn't been drastically altered, however we thought, according to our audience feedback and personal opinion we would change little sections to make it more consistent. Below are the main points which we have changed.

  • Window section where Sophie comes out of character - This shot has been shortened and the shot which follows it has been increased.
  • During the spinning 360 degree shots, we have shortened the start due to it giving the impression that Sophie is "waiting" for the chorus to start
  • During the slow bridge in the middle, there were inconsistent eye view errors, which we thought we could erase by longing the shots before. This still worked well because of the slow tempo section.
  • We felt that the ambiguous photo shot worked well, because it leaves the emotion of the character in the decision of the audience, therefore increasing their engagement within the music video.

Thursday 16 December 2010

Thursday 16th December - Final CD Digipack

Final CD Digipack

A) CD Front

B) Digipack page 1

C) Digipack page 2

D) Digipack page 3
E) Digipack page 4

F) CD Digipack page 5


G) Digipack back
The opposite personalities on each page of the digipack represents the theme of the album (and the acoustic and rocky tracks) and reinforces cohesion between the Music Video and the artist's album artwork.
Video: Sophie opening our CD Digipack
(I filmed)


Thursday 16th December - Final Website



Above is our final website design.

Wednesday 15 December 2010

Wednesday 15th December - YouTube Feedback

YouTube Feedback



Above are comments from the Draft Edit on YouTube. Anna Neale herself has commented.

Monday 29 November 2010

Monday 29th November - Audience Feedback

Audience Feedback

We showcased our first drafts to our class and certain other A2 Media Studies students to get constructive feedback so that improvements could be made.

Below are the comments which were received after this showcase.

Positives:


  • Lip-syncing was well executed
  • Performance was very believable
  • Variety of shots/angles worked well
  • The confidence in Sophie, as an actor, was shown, therefore making the performance effective
  • The lighting in the music video was appropriate and showed the shot clearly
  • The narrative was easy to follow
  • Very sharp and great edits "to the beat" during fast sections + good variety of edits
  • Camera movement and placement was effective
  • Black and white worked "well" and suited the track and narrative
  • Good use of symbolism "mannequin"
  • Pan and zoom shot was very effective

Constructive Feedback points:

  • Pre-song material - track wasn't appropriate
  • Sophie smiles at the end of the "window scene"
  • "Fuzzy" bit at the start where the screen goes shaky - this problem happened during the capturing process
  • Photo album - could be more specific and show who is in them. Ambiguity works well though.

This feedback was all collected by teenagers who are the all the same age (17/18). This is only a small fraction of our specfic target group, therefore more audience feedback plans to be collected.

Friday 26 November 2010

Draft Edit - "Not Made For This" Music Video

Above is out first draft edit of our Music Video "Not Made For This" - Anna Neale

W/C - Monday 26th November - Editing

Editing: W/C 26th November

Monday 26th November: Period 1 + 2 (Media Lesson), Period 4 + 5 (Study Periods)

Today we started editing our final project for the "rough edit". Although it was a tricky process cutting shots in to the correct places and syncing Sophie's singing to the track, Me and Josh made a start. We had the prologue sorted because that was completed a few weeks ago. This was completed because it was a straight forward long take and a few establishing shots. Sophie and Tom were absent from this lesson because of a family illness, however I though it was best to edit without them because throughout this project our time management hadn't been great, and seeing as though we had to re-film sections, our plan was put back a week, therefore I thought we couldn't lose any more hours, not being efficient. I spent the afternoon attempting to add to the progress we had made this morning, however the system was very slow and kept freezing.

Tuesday 22nd November - Period 3, 4 + 5 (Study Periods)

Last week, Josh put together the first initial shots together of Sophie on the bench, however long takes were used to just test the "black and white" colour on our video. However, because this looked very "boring" and due to the fact we had other camera angles of the same shot, I decided to change it to make it more interesting for an audience member to watch. I used straight cuts during this process so that we stayed conventional to chart music videos. As we inserted the new clips, which we filmed last week in to Adobe, the system crashed and froze. It said at the top of the screen "Not responding" therefore we couldn't continue. We then discovered that the format of the files which we filmed were different to the others and required a much faster processor. Josh spent lunchtime converting the files to a manageable format and cut them whilst I inserted the completed converted ones in to the document and cropped them to fit our video. During period 4 + 5, after we had left the original document open, I edited with Josh's opinions at certain points. We inserted the transition shots in to the first bridge and chorus and ended the day after we had completed the first chorus.

Wednesday 23rd November - Period 1 + 2 (Study Periods) + After School - 2.55PM - 5.00PM

This morning, I came in to continue with the editing work. Josh came during period 2. I continued on to the second verse, cutting between the new wall shots and mannequin shots. This process was very time consuming because I had to listen to the track very closely to match the lip syncing. The computer that I was on wasn't producing the accurate sound therefore I had to move to the main computer with the room speakers. I did this so I could ensure the lip syncing was perfect. After the second chorus I moved on through the video to the slow bridge in the middle and tried to figure out the ending to try and increase the climax to match the songs tempo. The bridge was fairly straight forward to edit because I wanted a long take, so that the audience have time to empathise with the character, as she shows different layers to her personality. After having completed the ending I showed some peers in the other A2 media class and they offered certain ideas but mainly said that the idea of reversing the corset short and fast fades worked well. Due to it being break, I stopped and thought I would leave Tom and Sophie in charge, during period 3, of the second chorus and the instrumental in between the bridge the middle section. I returned at lunch to find that nothing had been continued because it froze, which it shouldn't have done. Therefore we made a group decision to stay after school to make up the time and try and finish it.

After school Josh edited whilst we all offered ideas and opinions from the front, because it was shown on the big screen. This worked well and increased the teamwork effort in our group. I showed everyone the sections I had done, earlier in the week and they liked them. After this after school session, the rough draft of the music video had been completed. This was very rewarding and we were happy with the finished product. It was very handy to have people's opinions in the after school section because whilst I was on my own I felt as if I was doing it on my own, without my groups approval, however it had to be finished and there wasn't enough time where we were all off.

I would say that I have had a big input in the editing process, just because I came in and edited independently sometimes because we had lost time further back in the weeks, because of inset days, computers not responding and I wasn't going to use that as an excuse, for it being late. It was nice to have an major input in the editing process just because I wasn't so "hands on" in the filming, in terms of holding the camera. But I am very proud of the shot and edits so hopefully, the editing choices I made will increase the audience interaction the engagement.

Thursday 18 November 2010

Thurday 18th November - Deleted Shots and Why?

Deleted Shots and Why?









Pan of the coffee table - This shot was deleted due to its ambiguity and link to the plot. We took this shot to fill in space later on in the editing process. This also was initially planned to be a shot to set the scene and make the audience understanding where these scenes are set and what type of house and class these characters are from. However this shot became unnecessary and had very little connection with our plot.

Character Cage Shot - This shot was deleted because we didn't film this in wide screen. Also while she was singing she threw her head down towards the floor in anger (and character), this shot therefore, when editing couldn't be cut to anything else because her face, during her performance went out of the the camera frame. We planned to re-film this shot, and achieved the shot we wanted.

Character Wall Shot (Left Close Up) - We initially planned this shot to move to the beat, with Sophie's hair flying around as she sang the bridge before the main chorus. However whilst editing this shot looked very unprofessional and major continuity errors occurred. This shot has been abandoned. It will be replaced with other wall shots.

Character Walking,Stood and Running in the rain - This shot, due to the rain looked perfectly and could metaphorically represent the vulnerable character crying, however the filming was quite shaky, because we were concentrating on keeping the camera dry plus it wasn't it wide screen. This shot was quite spontaneous, we had planned it during our planning process, however it was obviously weather dependant. On our filming sessions previously, we didn't get the luck, therefore this should was abondoned and will just be replaced by Sophie walking down the street.

Character Corset shots - There were several shots with Sophie walking towards the camera, avoiding eye contact walking quite seductively, with anger. Plus another shot with her taking her corset off, and throwing it out towards the road. This shout would have increased voyeurism however unluckily this shot was again not filmed in wide screen and when we enlarged it on the editing software it became pixelated.

Character Wall Shots - These shots, unfortunately weren't in wide screen but also didn't have correct white balance property. This shot when placed on the editing software couldn't be edited to recover the original colour, therefore was abandoned. These shots were planned to be re-filmed and we achieved this in our re-filming filming session.


Above are the some examples of the shots above (in video form), plus other shots which have been abondoned or replaced.

Wednesday 17 November 2010

Wednesday 17th November - Re- Filming (continued)

Re- filming - Continued (Wall shots and middle bridge)




This filming session was entirely aimed to re-shoot the wall shots due to the mistakes made in the last filming session (s).

Firstly we filmed Sophie singing the second verse on the wall, like before. We similarly did this for all the shots that we had filmed before so that there would be no gaps in the music video as it currently stands. During this filming session due to our previous knowledge of how interesting eh music video looks when there are different angles and shots involved. Therefore due to this, we filmed these wall shots several times, more than we did in the first filming session, to ensure that there was enough footage available to cut within. The process was faster this time, because we knew which angle we were going to shoot and also Sophie was more familiar with the song, therefore the performance came across more confident. This will hopefully help the character’s alter ego’s emotion of “anger” and “frustration” to come across more clearly.

We then filmed the “bridge” shot, which we had done with the mannequin but we thought it needed doing again, because Sophie’s performance in that section of the “mannequin” scenes isn’t overly confident, due to the fact that that section was rushed due to our poor planning. Therefore we filmed this again in the leaves near a curb. The choice of location was because I thought that she would look quite vulnerable if she is positioned low to the ground, and although dressed in the “alter ego” costume, the positioning of her will be incongruous to the previous act, therefore showing different layers of the character to the audience, hopefully then making them empathising with her. This slow section in the song, is a huge section of the narrative, because it is where the character gets confused and makes drastic decisions. Therefore slow cuts and long takes are used in this section so that the audience can concentrate on the character and really try to understand them. I filmed this section, which was a nice experience seeing as though I had taken a back seat on most of the filming, bar the odd shots, until now. I filmed this shot because I had the clearest image in my head how I wanted this shot to look and how it would work the best. To add to the effect of the shot, it was windy, therefore Sophie’s hair blew in the wind, therefore creating quite a vulnerable image, giving the impression of the character “thinking”. I positioned myself around Sophie and we made sure the leaves were in the shot, doing the bridge section several times. After the bridge to the beat of the music she flicked her hair and kicked the leaves. This shot was to fill the instrumental section but also to increase the voyeurism in this shot.

We also filmed Sophie walking towards the camera and did a hand held camera shot, where I walked backwards. This shot was quite successful because, due to the slight shaky camera work, which we wanted, it looked as if Sophie was coming at “the audience”, therefore symbolising them as the “boyfriend”. This would perhaps make Sophie look quite intimidating and the audience would maybe be unsure of what she is now capable off, this would hopefully make them engage with the music video, therefore increase audience engagement.

Towards the end of this section I tested a certain idea which contained possibly breaking the 360 degree rule, however we would cut it, during editing process so this wouldn’t be applied. I circled Sophie as she sang the penultimate chorus, this would hopefully give the impression that her mind is confused, frustrated and the spinning shot would maybe make the audience feel displaced and unsure again, about what she is capable off. This was a spontaneous shot, which may be used in the final product to portray her confusion.


Draft On Set Filming Video - Verse/Bridge 1

Draft On Set Filming Video - Verse/Chorus 2

Above are two on location filming, filmed by me to get a first impression of the shots. (Note - Sound quality isn't muted)

Tuesday 16 November 2010

Tuesday 16th November - Narrative Shots + Re-filming

Filming - Narrative Shots + Re-Filming

(below are photos from the filming session on the 16th November)


In this filming session our aim was to reinforce our music video’s narrative and moral. This was completed by planning certain shots which would show the vulnerable character transforming in to a more confident revenge-seeking, violent character, and this transformation given a reason.

Firstly we filmed the first chorus on a double bed, via a crane shot to make Sophie look vulnerable, this was also reinforced by the bed pillows the duvet. This was quite a hard shot to film because the tripod was positioned on the bed with the legs either side of Sophie’s waist, however they then became noticed in the shot, and not only was the shot not overly steady but Sophie wasn’t comfortable. Therefore we had to readjust the shot type, but luckily we still portrayed the shot that was initially planned.

The next shot was Sophie singing the first verse sat up on the bed with her mobile phone. This shot, due to the prop, added a narrative to the shot. The composition of the shot we thought was very effective and portrayed the image that we wanted however it was hard for Sophie to get off the bed after the end of the verse to give the impression that she has had enough and was going to “change” (metaphorically in terms of her emotions and also physically in terms of her appearance). She tried getting of the bed smoothly, but due to the size of the bed it looked very unnatural.

We then filmed the “changing” shots. We started with the corset. We filmed this shot using an insert shot portraying the mirrors perception of the action. Sophie, in the shot showed her upper bare back, this was to increase the voyeurism in the shot and then the corset was placed over the skin. This mirror shot portrayed intimacy and will hopefully result in the audience members being engaged with the music video. In the same shot we filmed Sophie applying her make up, this was another transformation shot and was again an insert, close up shot. We then filmed Sophie zipping up her boot. This close up shot of the boot portrayed the dark side of the character and increased the "confidence" in the character by her decision to wear a risky pair of high heeled boots. These transformation shots will be slipped in to the bridge before the first chorus to show the character transforming from the vulnerable/ innocent persona to the violent, confident, strong one. Hopefully these shots will increase the narrative structure and make it obvious to the audience that the character is going through a transformation due to her negative experience with her boyfriend (symbolised by the mannequin).

After those shots we quickly filmed a shot of Sophie walking out the door of her house, implying that she is leaving in her outfit/new personality to cause some damage. This shot was filmed about five or six times because we figured that Sophie had to walk fully out the door and around the corner due to the translucent window in the door. The camera was situated behind her as she stormed out with the door slammed behind her. The door was fairly heavy therefore it took a few takes to get the strength for the slam. In addition to this shot, we filmed a take of Sophie walking out her drive, to the street where the second verse is filmed. This was purposefully filmed to be filler if we needed narrative shots later on in the editing process. This shot would also make the narrative more obviously and decrease the transport gaps.

In this filming session we also re-filmed the first bridge, chorus and second chorus because we realised that we hadn't got any footage for certain lines in the second chorus and realised that the original first chorus and bridge we filmed wasn't in wide screen. We attempted stretching the clip in adobe premier pro but it lost pixels and the quality of the footage wasn't suitable for viewing. Due to having had done this before this shot didn't take as long as the previous version. However we discovered another location for the second chorus, therefore we used the wooden fence for Sophie to climb on whilst filming the chorus. This enabled the character to adopt "risky", "rebel" characters which would reinforce the new transformed personality.